FAIL (the browser should render some flash content, not this).
Decision Analysis - 2 of 5

Why analyse decisions?

If you have ever faced a difficult decision that caused you sleepless nights, the problems associated with making hard decisions will be all too familiar to you.  Both business professionals and psychologists have observed common flaws in the way people make decisions.  Psychologist Daniel Kahneman received the Nobel Prize for his studies on how biases strongly and systematically affect intuitive decisions.  He concluded that we use unconscious shortcuts, termed heuristics, to cope with complex decisions.  “In general, these heuristics are useful, but sometimes they lead to severe and systematic errors”.

Recognizing these common problems helps us to understand what decision analysis can do for us:

  1. Poor framing: stating the exact same decision alternative in positive or negative terms can significantly impact the attractiveness of the alternative.

  2. Recency effects: decision makers frequently make decisions based on the information they have seen most recently.

  3. Primacy effects: once a frame of reference for analyzing an issue develops, decision makers often find it difficult to move from that position.

  4. Probability estimation: decision makers tend to overestimate the probability of events that are familiar or dramatic, and greatly underestimate negative events.

  5. Overconfidence: decision makers tend to be overconfident about the accuracy of what they know.

  6. Sunk costs: decision makers find it difficult to abandon courses of action that have already been adopted.

  7. Association bias: decision makers try to repeat past successes by choosing strategies more related to a past situation than the current one.

Previous Page 2 of 5 Next